Clik here to view.
RE: How to set conditional tests in ADEXL to avoid running tests not needed...
That might be possible, but I suspect it's quite difficult to implement (if at all). Could also potentially implement this using a loop in a pre-run script (right mouse button over the test in ADE XL)...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: How to set conditional tests in ADEXL to avoid running tests not needed...
Thanks again Andrew for the reply and the suggestion. Have a great day.
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: check the instance symbol change in schematic
This worked perfectly for me. Thank you for the quick help! - Phill
View ArticleClik here to view.
more pin name and net name checking at check and save
Hi, How to add in more custom checking during the check and save? For example, we would like to forbid some specific keywords (say, verilog keywords in a list file) for pin names or even wire/net...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Engineers, and How to Manage Them
I've covered various aspects of an EDA company: sales, marketing, application engineers, even being the CEO. Today, it is the turn of engineering. My background is engineering. I started my career...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Creating a footprint with surface mount pads on top and bottom layers
I hate dusting off an old thread, but I am having the same problem with 17.2 in creating a footprint for an edge card. I have followed each and every of the suggestions, in this thread and others, but...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Creating a footprint with surface mount pads on top and bottom layers
Do you mind attaching your symbol to this thread? Or send a PM so it can be looked at closer. No reason you should be getting that error so something is setup wrong.
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Creating a footprint with surface mount pads on top and bottom layers
I think I found it. I defined the top set of pads as the BEGIN LAYER and the bottom set of pads as the END LAYER. No more DRC errors, but I'm used to seeing the pin labels reversed on the opposite side...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Creating a footprint with surface mount pads on top and bottom layers
Can't see a way to hang the file(s) to this thread, otherwise I'd show you where I got to.
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Question for inserting dbid by typing on function
Thanks, I understand it can be changed whenever I use the tool, but in the same session, the part already placed dbId would not be changed and when I selected it, I could approach its dbId. The point...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Question for inserting dbid by typing on function
Because dbId:254233152 is not a "thing" it's just a label. You can't use it because it's meaningless.
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Question for inserting dbid by typing on function
Appreciate it Now I fully understand Thank you again!
View ArticleClik here to view.
Leakage current and Leakage power
Hello, I'm designing an SRAM cell for my project using 45nm technology. I would like to calculate the leakage current and the leakage power. Could anyone elaborate the steps that I need to follow?
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Creating a footprint with surface mount pads on top and bottom layers
In your reply, click on "Insert" and then choose "Insert Image/Video/File" and choose a zip (or other format they now allow).
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Inconsistent "PSD" results between MATLAB & Cadence Calculator
Hi Andrew, Sorry for late reply. Indeed you've pointed out the problem I never thought before. The result is finally correlate with what I did in MATLAB after modifying the time interval you suggested....
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: MonteCarlo simulation is taking much longer time than expected
[quote userid="290320" url="~/cadence_technology_forums/f/custom-ic-design/38382/montecarlo-simulation-is-taking-much-longer-time-than-expected/1353911#1353911"][/quote] Could you please tell why as...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: Creating a footprint with surface mount pads on top and bottom layers
OK, I hope that has it all. community.cadence.com/.../hsc8_2D00_120_2D00_01_2D00_x_2D00_ra_2D00_card.zip
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: MonteCarlo simulation is taking much longer time than expected
Dear Andrew, I installed the latest specter sub-version 17.1.0.160.isr2. But it is saying no license for this version. (though we have full support license) I filed a case regarding this . ( Fighting...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: MonteCarlo simulation is taking much longer time than expected
Each new major release of any of our software requires you to ensure you have the latest version in your license file. The features are the same, but the version numbers get increased (this is to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: MonteCarlo simulation is taking much longer time than expected
Ok, so I have to wait for customer support reply. By the way, if I set run points = 100 , it shows in the run bar as " running- 74 /200 complete" . It should have been " running- 74 /100 complete". Why...
View Article