Quantcast
Channel: Jason Andrews Blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 33813

RE: Is it possible to define interchangeable part numbers in a BOM?

$
0
0
Hi Evan I went back over what you wrote and the only thing that I am not very clear on is where you say "They are form and fit compatible" I can see the case where having multiple vendor P/N's would be a good fit using attributes as in PCAD but in such a case your physical footprint on the board will still be the same, like a 1206 resistor etc. Form & fit to me seems to indicate some sort of "Module Assembly" , would that be right ? I can see where your footprint may be X, but footprint X can be a module which means it's form and fit does not vary from a footprint perspective but it's actual function can vary widely in particular if said module contains something like an FPGA or some other programmable logic. I don't have much exposure to the allegro front end "Concept" I am living in the Orcad Capture world here. That been said it seems if my assumption is right with respect to modules then how to have a P/N for a module that can vary widely in function is a bit of a challenge. Not too sure how to approach this. Anyway, glad to put some ideas out there. The dialog on this is good. Thanks .... Paul.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 33813

Trending Articles